Welcome
Mission Statement
Firm Profile
FAQ
FAQ Family Law
FAQ DWI
FAQ Estate Planning
FAQ Real Estate
Common Mistakes in DWI Cases
Article of the Month
News
Contact Us
Internet Links
Payment Forms
Download
Case Law Down Loads
e-mail me

   News and Events  

Back to Top
  September 9th, 2008

New Jersey Woman Settles Discrimination Lawsuit

PASSAIC - The city has agreed to settle a sex discrimination lawsuit filed by the city's first female firefighter.

The $450,000 settlement, approved in August, will be paid to former firefighter Glorimar Silva and her husband, Domingo Silva.

Silva, 36, who is known as Gloria, alleged in a 2005 complaint filed in U.S. District Court that the city's Fire Department created a hostile work environment in which she was harassed because of her gender. Silva's complaint alleges that fellow firefighters taunted her, intimidated her, failed to promote her and failed to pay her overtime. Silva alleged that when she reported the discrimination to her supervisors, they ignored her.

Her husband was also named as a plaintiff in the lawsuit because he claims to have suffered stress as a result of rumors that his wife was sleeping with her supervisor. He said the situation with his wife humiliated and alienated him from fellow firefighters. He said that as a result of the hostility toward his wife, the department transferred him from his normal shift and assignment.

Neither Silva nor her lawyer returned phone calls for comment.

Silva and her husband have left the department. Of its 113 current members, there are no female firefighters. No information was available about where the Silvas are now.

Maureen McFadden, a spokeswoman for the International Association of Women in Fire and Emergency Services, said the settlement agreement leaves lingering questions about whether the suit will affect the department's ability to hire women in the future. Additionally, questions remain about what, if any, reforms have been enacted by the department's top brass, some of whom were named in the suit.

"If I were a citizen of Passaic, and I were paying taxes, I would ask, Was what happened to this woman worth nearly half a million dollars of my tax money?" McFadden said in a telephone interview from New York. "I would ask, Who has been fired as a result of this settlement and what happened to the perpetrators and why are they still on the force? How many women who will come after her will have the same experience, file the same lawsuit and get the same settlement?"

McFadden said Silva's experience is "heartbreakingly typical" in the Northeast, where jobs are passed down from father to son and uncle to nephew, creating a "culture of inheritance."

"How can Passaic excuse the fact that this is 2008 and this is the first woman on the job, when there are at least 40 women fire chiefs around the country?" McFadden said. "This isn't tolerable behavior. I would also ask how many Latinos, how many South Asians and how many African-Americans are on the job?"

Larry Dostanko, the union president for Local 113, said he didn't think the Silva suit would affect the department's ability to recruit women in the future.

"I don't think Gloria's situation is going to create a stigma for any other woman coming up," Dostanko said, adding that with the exception of hearing the rumor that Silva had an affair with her supervising lieutenant, he never witnessed any of the harassment she alleged against the Fire Department.

He said that when Silva became the city's first woman firefighter in 2002, the department conducted sensitivity training among the firefighters to avert gender bias against her. He said it's hard to change the culture of a firehouse.

"All the grab-assing that goes on, you'd think everybody was gay. But it's because we are all buddies here," Dostanko said. That's just men being guys. When you put a woman in the mix (who is) not accustomed to it, they can find it to be a hostile working environment."

Dostanko said department members have not undergone sensitivity training since 2002. In the aftermath of the lawsuit, he said, he is not aware of any discussions taking place among fire officials about what could be done to ensure all firefighters are treated equally.

Deputy Mayor Robert Hare, who is the fire director, did not return phone calls for comment this week.

The complaint mentions that Silva filed a separate suit against the department after the city refused to hire her in 2000 and that the case was later settled.

The most recent lawsuit alleged that fellow employees and supervisors said things like, "She does not belong," "Women are weak" and "That's a man's job." During one fire, when a replacement company arrived, a colleague allegedly told Silva to "get out of the way and let a real firefighter in."

Silva said she was placed on administrative duty for two years because of a leg injury, even though she had been medically cleared to fight fires. She also said she was not adequately paid for overtime work. She alleged she was the target of repeated cruel acts. She said someone hung men's underwear in front of her locker, posted sexually explicit photographs in the women's restroom, and placed feces in her mailbox. The underwear incident ended up becoming part of an internal affairs investigation.

Chief Patrick Trentacost would not comment on the outcome of the investigation or the other allegations Silva made. Trentacost did say that Silva was provided with a private changing room and a private bathroom, both of which had locks on them.

When asked if departmental policy had changed as a result of the lawsuit, Trentacost, who was named in the suit, said, "We have policies in place, and they have always been in place. We have an active anti-harassment policy that is reviewed on a yearly basis."

Trentacost said there are currently two women on the department's applicant list. But, he said, the Fire Department does not have any open positions.




Back to Top
  September 1st, 2008

Ambulance chief charged in 'john' sweep; wife expecting

MADISON - One of the 10 alleged "johns" arrested on a charge of patronizing prostitutes is chief of the Madison Ambulance Association and has been put on administrative leave, according to an ambulance board member.

Advertisement
Steven Shaw, 30, of 306 Greenhill Road, Madison, was picked up by New Haven police late Thursday night with nine other men in the Fair Haven neighborhood as the city continued its Prostitution Reduction Initiative.

Although Shaw is not a town employee, his arrest comes at a time when the Madison Police Department is being rocked with corruption allegations.

William Lewis, vice president of the ambulance association's board, said Shaw will remain on administrative leave at least until the board meets to discuss the issue. Lewis said the meeting date has not yet been set.
According to Lewis, Shaw is a paramedic with a good record.
"This is extremely unfortunate," Lewis said. "He's been a stellar employee and a real committed guy to the community."
Lewis added, "It's sad to see something like this come along, but we don't have all the facts. It's a tragedy for his family."
Shaw is married and he and his wife reportedly are expecting their second child.

The Madison Ambulance Association is a private comany, contracted by the town.



Back to Top
  August 27th, 2008

Injured Firefighter fights her dismissal.


OVERLAND — Angry and bitter after watching her daughter endure 2½ years of surgeries and rehab due to burns suffered in a house fire, Marolyn Schuenke confronted the Community Fire Protection District board of directors Tuesday night.

"You guys all had your arms around me in the hospital saying you'd take care of her," Schuenke charged as the directors, eyes cast downward, walked to their cars following a closed board meeting called to address the termination of firefighter-paramedic Cindy Schuenke.

The board members — Leo Morrow, Dan Doerr and Fran Costello — and board attorney Neil Bruntrager told reporters they could not comment on Schuenke's status after the meeting with Schuenke and her attorney, Michael Schaller.

Schaller, meanwhile, expressed outrage over the meeting and the reason for it: the board's decision in July to terminate Schuenke. That decision, Schaller said, was "far too premature." He said the directors didn't let him know Tuesday whether Schuenke's job status would change.

On March 29, 2006, while searching for the mother of a fellow firefighter in a burning house in Vinita Terrace, Schuenke fell into a fiery basement. She suffered severe burns, the worst of which resulted in the amputation of several fingertips and one of her little fingers. Since the fire, she has had multiple surgeries but has maintained her desire to return to work as a firefighter-paramedic.

Community's board met with Schuenke and Schaller due to a grievance against the board alleging that the directors had failed to give Schuenke a hearing, as district policy requires, before terminating her in July.

Schuenke learned she'd been fired in a letter from fire district Chief Fred Cain. "Given the nature and extent of your injuries, it is clear that you are unable to perform the duties required in that position," the letter said.

Schuenke was fired despite a June 11 letter from her surgeon, Dr. Michael Smock, in which he wrote that Schuenke hadn't reached a plateau in her recovery and that he believed it would take another year or more for her to reach a point of "maximum medical improvement."

"I cannot rule out the possibility of Ms. Schuenke returning to work as a firefighter/paramedic," Smock wrote.

Schaller said that while worker's comp will continue to cover medical costs for injuries Schuenke suffered in the fire, the termination leaves her without coverage for other medical issues. It also strips her of $50,000 in annual salary and pension and other benefits, he said.

"Here's somebody who risked her life to try to save the mother of a fire captain in this district and now, two years later, when all the smoke and dust has cleared, they're going to cut her loose and make her live off Social Security disability, and that's just not fair," Schaller said.

In tears after the meeting, Schuenke said her career wasn't over. "This is what I've always wanted to do with my life," she said. "I'm not done yet."

As reported by the the Saint Louis Post Dispatch



Back to Top
  August 25th, 2008

BROCKTON - A Boston deputy fire chief was ordered held without bail today after a prosecutor said he repeatedly pretended to be a police officer to force prostitutes to have sex with him.

Peter Pearson, 51, is charged in three attacks.

During his arraignment in Brockton District Court today, prosecutor Sharon Donatelle said Pearson was charged with a third attack on Sunday while he was already being held for a similar alleged assault in February 2005.

Pearson’s attorney, Kevin Reddington, entered a not guilty plea for him. Pearson was ordered held pending a dangerousness hearing Wednesday.

Reddington questioned the credibility of the alleged victims and argued that media coverage had prompted new accusations.

"These individuals have one common trait," Reddington said. "They’re all prostitutes."

Plymouth District Attorney Timothy Cruz said Pearson has preyed on "vulnerable people."

The first allegation was made in June when a woman detained by Brockton police told officers she had been sexually assaulted by a patrol officer two weeks earlier. In July, the woman identified Pearson as her attacker.

The most recent accuser said she was walking down Main Street in Brockton in the spring of 2003 when a blue, four-door car began to follow her, Donatelle said in court. The driver, whom the woman recently identified as Pearson, told her he was a state trooper, ordered her to get in car, showed her a gun and assaulted her, Donatelle said.

Pearson had been free on bond for charges of kidnapping and rape and was arrested again at his home in East Bridgewater Friday after the second woman came forward. She alleges that Pearson attacked her in February 2005.

Boston fire officials said Pearson has been placed on administrative leave without pay pending the outcome of the allegations. Pearson earned $158,900 last year as deputy chief.

Written by Boston Herald



Back to Top
  August 22nd, 2008

A volunteer firefighter who calls in false alarms and responds to the scene of the reported fire may be convicted of official misconduct under N.J.S.A. 2C:30-2, and a conviction for setting false fire alarms under N.J.S.A. 2C:33-3 merges into official misconduct when the false alarm constitutes the official misconduct.

Full court opinion below:

http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000045&DocName=NJST2C%3A30-7&FindType=L



Back to Top
  August 20th, 2008

New Jersey police stockpile assaut weapons.

BERGEN COUNTY, N.J. — North Jersey police are stockpiling some of the most sophisticated tactical and assault weapons on the market, but some residents question the need for such firepower in sleepy suburban towns.

Nearly half the agencies in a Record survey of 44 police departments said they own tactical weapons or plan to purchase them in the near future. Most departments are buying semiautomatic guns capable of one to three shots per trigger pull, while a handful of departments have fully automatic weapons capable of firing 10 bullets a second. A few have military-grade M16s or urban rifles that can blast through body armor.

“You’re not looking at major crime in these towns,” said Eric Krasnov, a 26-year-old from Harrington Park who works in Tenafly.

Krasnov and his colleagues were surprised to learn that Tenafly, a town with fewer than 15,000 people and with just a handful of violent crimes in the last few years, has an emergency tactical unit armed with fully automatic submachine guns.

“Our taxpayer money is not going to good use for these automatic weapons,” Krasnov said.

Police insist, however, that they must beef up their arsenals to keep pace with criminals and prepare for school shooters, terrorist attacks and other threats.

Experts say North Jersey’s weapons proliferation matches a national trend that began in the 1990s, sparked by events such as the North Hollywood bank shootout in California and the Columbine school massacre in Colorado. Fears of terrorism after 9/11 accelerated the transformation of police from patrol and investigative roles into that of “first responders.”

Keeping up with criminals

“There is a trend around the country of police departments getting more and more sophisticated weapons,” said Closter resident Maki Haberfeld, professor of police science at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York. “The reason is that we have the same trend with our criminals, who are arming themselves with these weapons.

“After 9/11, police departments became much more militarized in terms of response,” she added. “Tactical units were no longer just looked upon as a response to a situation with a couple of hostages, but more of a counterterrorism unit. There is this feeling that we now live in an era of counterterrorism, and the feeling is that you need to be prepared.”

Such fears come as crime rates are declining nationwide, Haberfeld said. New Jersey’s rate of nearly 17 violent crimes per 10,000 people ranks just above the median, according to 2006 crime statistics reported by local agencies to the FBI. Passaic County has 12 violent crimes per 10,000 people when excluding Passaic and Paterson, and 53 per 10,000 when those two cities are included.

Bergen County has fewer than 11 violent crimes per 10,000 people, and many of its more affluent towns fall far below that level.

Yet semiautomatic tactical guns are cropping up in towns such as Alpine, Closter and Norwood - where median incomes exceed $100,000 and where a total of eight violent crimes took place in 2005 and 2006.

Alpine beefed up its arsenal in the last year with a pair of Heckler & Koch UMP .40s, the most popular new weapon among the departments surveyed. The UMP, which costs $1,300, uses bullets that are interchangeable with officers’ handguns. But the UMPs are more accurate and powerful and can fire two-round bursts. Closter and Norwood have identical weapons, though their versions can only fire a single bullet per trigger pull.

“The criminals outgun us nowadays,” said Alpine police Lt. Michael LaViola. “Plus there are situations in the schools that have happened across the country. We practice active shooter scenarios these days, and these weapons are the best ones to handle these types of situations.”

Six of the police agencies surveyed have specialized tactical units, while the remaining towns rely on regional SWAT teams. In Passaic County, Clifton, Paterson and West Milford have SWAT-like units, said Bill Maer, Passaic County Sheriff’s Department spokesman. Wayne phased out its tactical team in recent years but has an arsenal that includes semiautomatic UMP .45s.

Police in Pompton Lakes also rely on county SWAT, although they have ordered four M4 urban rifles capable of piercing body armor.

“Paterson, Passaic and Clifton should be armed to the teeth because there are a whole lot more weapons found in those areas,” Pompton Lakes Detective Sgt. Steve Seifried said. “Up here, we need to have them in case we have a situation like in the North Hollywood robbery. … I don’t think in an area like this it would be feasible to have every officer have weapons like this in the trunk of their vehicle.”

In Bergen County, even towns with their own tactical weapons continue to rely on the Bergen County Police Department SWAT team and, occasionally, on a tactical unit from the Sheriff’s Office. The police SWAT team handles roughly 10 incidents per year, typically involving “high-risk” arrests and barricaded subjects, said Officer Scott Williams, a weapons instructor and 10-year veteran of the SWAT team.

He said SWAT members have not had to shoot a single person in the course of 400 jobs since the team’s creation in 1974.

“We’re very fortunate that we’ve come to some very peaceful conclusions to most of the jobs over the years in Bergen County,” Williams said.

Rarely used

Police in Bergen County towns also rarely use their weapons outside of training, according to firearms discharge reports filed with the county Prosecutor’s Office. In 2006 and 2007 combined, police officers in Bergen County fired 13 bullets: 10 shots to kill sick or dangerous animals (most of them in Norwood), and three accidental firings during the disassembly or inspection of a gun.

Such statistics hardly obviate the need to prepare for school shooters and other emergencies, according to local police chiefs, who say police cannot wait in such situations for the county SWAT team to arrive. Police chiefs even dismissed the idea of having clusters of towns rely on nearby agencies for first-response services - a move that could help smaller departments save on the costs of weapons and training.

“If you have to wait for somebody to go to Paramus to pick up a UMP it absolutely defeats the purpose,” Ramsey Police Chief Bryan Gurney said. His 30-member department has UMP-style weapons and shotguns.

“These weapons have to be deployed immediately,” he said. “It’s not like a firetruck or a street sweeper you can schedule. It’s a piece of equipment that has to be readily available to an officer at a moment’s notice.”

That philosophy has led North Arlington’s tactical squad to acquire one of the most diverse arsenals in the region, complete with shotguns, fully automatic submachine guns, high-powered urban rifles and M16s, a fully automatic military rifle.

“I wouldn’t care if they had tanks if they needed them,” said Bob Henke, a 52-year-old postal worker from North Arlington. “I’m for having everything at your disposal as long as it’s used cautiously and in a measured way.”

Matthew Marinaro, 40, wasn’t convinced of the need for such weapons.

“I think the police have the right to protect themselves the best they can,” Marinaro said. “But it’s not like the movies. This is North Arlington. I could see it in New York City, but it’s relatively quiet here.”

By the numbers

* Total rounds discharged in 2006 and 2007 by Bergen County police departments: 13.

* Rounds used to kill sick or dangerous animals: 10.

* Rounds fired accidentally: 3.

* Number of people shot during 400 incidents handled by Bergen County Police Department SWAT team since 1977: 0.

Fast fact

The Heckler & Koch UMP .40 is one of the most popular new weapons among North Jersey police departments. While most have standard semiautomatic versions of the gun, a handful of departments have purchased fully automatic models.

Price: $1,200




Back to Top
  August 19th, 2008

Modesto Ambulance Rollover Accident on Highway 99

The driver of a car suffered injuries in a rollover accident after a Riggs ambulance, that was trying to merge on to the fast lane on Highway 99, collided with a Nissan Altima. Shadi Ahmad, 29, of Modesto was transported to an area hospital, according an article in the Merced Sun-Star. The accident reportedly occurred near the R Street exit near Martin Luther King Jr. Way.

Both Riggs employees, 32-year-old Gilliam Maduena who was driving and another passenger, were not injured.

California Highway Patrol officials said both vehicles were traveling at 65 mph and rolled over after the collision. Fortunately, the ambulance was not carrying patients and was not on its way to a call. It is also fortunate that this accident did not result in major injuries or fatalities. Considering the speed at which the vehicles were traveling and the impact of the collision, this accident could’ve been a lot worse.




Back to Top
  Janaury 13th, 2010

Today the Governor signed into law changes to the Expungment Statute.
N.J.S.2C:52-2 is amended to read as follows: 2C:52-2. Indictable Offenses. a. In all cases, except as herein provided, wherein a person has been convicted of a crime under the laws of this State and who has not been convicted of any prior or subsequent crime, whether within this State or any other jurisdiction, and has not been adjudged a disorderly person or petty disorderly person on more than two occasions may, after the expiration of a period of 10 years from the date of his conviction, payment of fine, satisfactory completion of probation or parole, or release from incarceration, whichever is later, present a duly verified petition as provided in section 2C:52-7 to the Superior Court in the county in which the conviction was entered praying that such conviction and all records and information pertaining thereto be expunged. Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, [on motion of the petitioner, the court shall allow] a petition [to] may1 be filed and presented, [which may be granted] and the court may grant an expungement pursuant to this section, although less than 10 years has expired in accordance with the requirements of the preceding paragraph where the court finds: (1) less than 10 years has expired from the satisfaction of a fine, but the 10-year time requirement is otherwise satisfied, and the court finds that the person substantially complied with any payment plan ordered pursuant to N.J.S.2C:46-1 et seq., or could not do so due to compelling circumstances affecting his ability to satisfy the fine; or (2) at least five years has expired from the date of his conviction, payment of fine, satisfactory completion of probation or parole, or release from incarceration, whichever is later; the person has not been convicted of a crime, disorderly persons offense, or petty disorderly persons offense since the time of the conviction; and the court finds in its discretion that expungement is in the public interest, giving due consideration to the nature of the offense, and the applicant’s character and conduct since conviction. In determining whether compelling circumstances exist for the purposes of paragraph (1) of this subsection, a court may consider the amount of the fine or fines imposed, the person’s age at the time of the offense, the person’s financial condition and other relevant circumstances regarding the person’s ability to pay. Although subsequent convictions for no more than two disorderly or petty disorderly offenses shall not be an absolute bar to relief, the nature of those conviction or convictions and the circumstances surrounding them shall be considered by the court and may be a basis for denial of relief if they or either of them constitute a continuation of the type of unlawful activity embodied in the criminal conviction for which expungement is sought. b. Records of conviction pursuant to statutes repealed by this Code for the crimes of murder, manslaughter, treason, anarchy, kidnapping, rape, forcible sodomy, arson, perjury, false swearing, robbery, embracery, or a conspiracy or any attempt to commit any of the foregoing, or aiding, assisting or concealing persons accused of the foregoing crimes, shall not be expunged. Records of conviction for the following crimes specified in the New Jersey Code of Criminal Justice shall not be subject to expungement: Section 2C:11-1 et seq. (Criminal Homicide), except death by auto as specified in section 2C:11-5; section 2C:13-1 (Kidnapping); section 2C:13-6 (Luring or Enticing); section 1 of P.L.2005, c.77 (C.2C:13-8) (Human Trafficking); section 2C:14-2 (Aggravated Sexual Assault); section 2C:14-3a (Aggravated Criminal Sexual Contact); if the victim is a minor, section 2C:14-3b (Criminal Sexual Contact); if the victim is a minor and the offender is not the parent of the victim, section 2C:13-2 (Criminal Restraint) or section 2C:13-3 (False Imprisonment); section 2C:15-1 (Robbery); section 2C:17-1 (Arson and Related Offenses); section 2C:24-4a. (Endangering the welfare of a child by engaging in sexual conduct which would impair or debauch the morals of the child); section 2C:24-4b(4) (Endangering the welfare of a child); section 2C:24-4b. (3) (Causing or permitting a child to engage in a prohibited sexual act); section 2C:24:4b.(5)(a) (Selling or manufacturing child pornography); section 2C:28-1 (Perjury); section 2C:28-2 (False Swearing); section 2C:34-1b.(4) (Knowingly promoting the prostitution of the actor’s child); section 2 of P.L.2002, c.26 (C.2C:38-2) (Terrorism); subsection a. of section 3 of P.L.2002, c.26 (C.2C:38-3) (Producing or Possessing Chemical Weapons, Biological Agents or Nuclear or Radiological Devices); and conspiracies or attempts to commit such crimes. Records of conviction for any crime committed by a person holding any public office, position or employment, elective or appointive, under the government of this State or any agency or political subdivision thereof and any conspiracy or attempt to commit such a crime shall not be subject to expungement if the crime involved or touched such office, position or employment. c. In the case of conviction for the sale or distribution of a controlled dangerous substance or possession thereof with intent to sell, expungement shall be denied except where the crimes [relate to] involve: (1) Marijuana, where the total quantity sold, distributed or possessed with intent to sell was 25 grams or less [, or] ; (2) Hashish, where the total quantity sold, distributed or possessed with intent to sell was five grams or less; or (3) Any controlled dangerous substance provided that the conviction is of the third or fourth degree, where the court finds that expungement is consistent with the public interest, giving due consideration to the nature of the offense and the petitioner’s character and conduct since conviction. d. In the case of a State licensed physician or podiatrist convicted of an offense involving drugs or alcohol or pursuant to section 14 or 15 of P.L.1989, c.300 (C.2C:21-20 or 2C:21-4.1), the court shall notify the State Board of Medical Examiners upon receipt of a petition for expungement of the conviction and records and information pertaining thereto. (cf: P.L.1994, c.133, s.6) 2. Section 1 of P.L.1980, c.163 (C.2C:52-4.1) is amended to read as follows: 1. a. Any person adjudged a juvenile delinquent may have such adjudication expunged as follows: (1) Pursuant to N.J.S.2C:52-2, if the act committed by the juvenile would have constituted a crime if committed by an adult; (2) Pursuant to N.J.S.2C:52-3, if the act committed by the juvenile would have constituted a disorderly or petty disorderly persons offense if committed by an adult; or (3) Pursuant to N.J.S.2C:52-4, if the act committed by the juvenile would have constituted an ordinance violation if committed by an adult. For purposes of expungement, any act which resulted in a juvenile being adjudged a delinquent shall be classified as if that act had been committed by an adult. b. Additionally, any person who has been adjudged a juvenile delinquent may have his entire record of delinquency adjudications expunged if: (1) Five years have elapsed since the final discharge of the person from legal custody or supervision or 5 years have elapsed after the entry of any other court order not involving custody or supervision, except that periods of post-incarceration supervision pursuant to section 25 of P.L.1982, c.77 (C.2A:4A-44), shall not be considered in calculating the five-year period for purposes of this paragraph; (2) He has not been convicted of a crime, or a disorderly or petty disorderly persons offense, or adjudged a delinquent, or in need of supervision, during the 5 years prior to the filing the petition, and no proceeding or complaint is pending seeking such a conviction or adjudication, except that periods of post-incarceration supervision pursuant to section 25 of P.L.1982, c.77 (C.2A:4A-44), shall not be considered in calculating the five-year period for purposes of this paragraph; (3) He was never adjudged a juvenile delinquent on the basis of an act which if committed by an adult would constitute a crime not subject to expungement under N.J.S.2C:52-2; (4) He has never had an adult conviction expunged; and (5) He has never had adult criminal charges dismissed following completion of a supervisory treatment or other diversion program. c. Any person who has been charged with an act of delinquency and against whom proceedings were dismissed may have the filing of those charges expunged pursuant to the provisions of N.J.S.2C:52-6. (cf: P.L.1981, c.290, s.44) 3. N.J.S.2C:52-14 is amended to read as follows: 2C:52-14. A petition for expungement filed pursuant to this chapter shall be denied when: a. Any statutory prerequisite, including any provision of this chapter, is not fulfilled or there is any other statutory basis for denying relief. b. The need for the availability of the records outweighs the desirability of having a person freed from any disabilities as otherwise provided in this chapter. An application may be denied under this subsection only following objection of a party given notice pursuant to 2C:52-10 and the burden of asserting such grounds shall be on the objector, except that in regard to expungement sought for third or fourth degree drug offenses pursuant to paragraph (3) of subsection c. of N.J.S.2C:52-2, the court shall consider whether this factor applies regardless of whether any party objects on this basis. c. In connection with a petition under section 2C:52-6, the acquittal, discharge or dismissal of charges resulted from a plea bargaining agreement involving the conviction of other charges. This bar, however, shall not apply once the conviction is itself expunged. d. The arrest or conviction sought to be expunged is, at the time of hearing, the subject matter of civil litigation between the petitioner or his legal representative and the State, any governmental entity thereof or any State agency and the representatives or employees of any such body. A1771 [1R] WATSON COLEMAN, SPENCER e. A person has had a previous criminal conviction expunged regardless of the lapse of time between the prior expungement, or sealing under prior law, and the present petition. This provision shall not apply: (1) When the person is seeking the expungement of a municipal ordinance violation or, (2) When the person is seeking the expungement of records 8pursuant to section 2C:52-6. f. The person seeking the relief of expungement of a conviction for a disorderly persons, petty disorderly persons, or criminal offense has prior to or subsequent to said conviction been granted the dismissal of criminal charges following completion of a supervisory treatment or other diversion program. (cf: N.J.S.2C:52-14) This act shall take effect on the 60th day after enactment.





|Welcome| |Mission Statement| |Firm Profile| |FAQ| |FAQ Family Law| |FAQ DWI| |FAQ Estate Planning| |FAQ Real Estate| |Common Mistakes in DWI Cases| |Article of the Month| |News| |Contact Us| |Internet Links| |Payment Forms| |Download| |Case Law Down Loads|